Showing posts with label FAA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FAA. Show all posts

Sunday, December 27, 2015

Spatial Law and Policy Update (December 27, 2015)

SPATIAL LAW AND POLICY UPDATE
"Where Geospatial Technology Is Taking the Law"


LEGAL DISCIPLINES

Privacy

CDT Proposes Privacy Best Practices for Drones  (Center for Democracy and Technology)  Imagine trying to apply these to other platforms . . . That is where we are headed.




Data Quality

Licensing

Judge, siding with Google, refuses to shut down Waze in wake of alleged theft  (ars technica) This is an important case involving the copyrightability of geospatial data. 

Government

    Spatial Data Infrastructure/Open Data


    
    Public Safety/Law Enforcement/National Security



TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS

GNSS



UAVs







Internet of Things/Smart Grid/Intelligent Transportation Systems


Here's why lawyers are 'salivating' over self-driving cars  (Business Insider) “You're going to get a whole host of new defendants,” Kevin Dean, an attorney suing General Motors over its faulty ignition switches,told Bloomberg. “Computer programmers, computer companies, designers of algorithms, Google, mapping companies, even states. It's going to be very fertile ground for lawyers.” [emphasis added].

Remote Sensing


Crowdsourcing


MISCELLANEOUS

Future Trends in Geospatial Information Management: Five to Ten Year Vision  (UN-GGIM) The Centre was a significant contributor to the Legal and Policy Section of this report. 

Monday, September 29, 2014

FAA Provides Guidance on Commercial Use of UAVs

Recently, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted several film and television production companies the right to use UAVs for filming. The FAA’s permission for such use is an exemption to the general prohibition in the U.S. on the use of UAVs for commercial purposes and were issued in response to written requests by these companies pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (“Section 333”). Section 333 grants the FAA the authority to determine whether certain UAVs can operate in the national airspace subject to certain requirements or conditions. According to published reports there have been approximately 40 such requests made and the FAA is trying to make a decision upon a request within 120 days of receipt.


The FAA letters granting approval are quite detailed (and technical). As a result, I have tried to identify the main requirements below:
  • The UAV must weigh less than 55 pounds (25 Kg), including energy source(s) and equipment.
  • The UAV may not be flown at a speed exceeding a ground speed of 50 knots.
  • Flights must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level.
  • The UAV must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the Pilot-In-Command (PIC) at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses.
  • All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement, as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times.
  • Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure it is in a condition for safe flight.
  • The operator must follow the manufacturer’s UAS aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.
  • The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third-class medical certificate. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements for an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his/her pilot certificate.  In addition, the PIC must have accumulated and logged:
  • a minimum of 200 flight cycles and 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot and at least ten hours logged as a UAS pilot with a similar UAS type; and,
  • a minimum of five hours as UAS pilot operating the make and model of the UAS to be utilized for operations under the exemption and have conducted three take-offs and three landings in the preceding 90 days.
  • The UAV may not be operated directly over any person, except authorized and consenting personnel, or below an altitude that is hazardous to persons or property on the surface.
  • The operator must ensure that persons are not allowed within 500 feet of the area except those consenting to be involved and necessary.
  • The UAS must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the operator’s manual.
  • Each UAS operation must be completed within 30 minutes flight time or with 25 battery power remaining, whichever occurs first.
  • The UAV must yield the right of way to all other manned operations and activities at all times.
  • The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under this grant or exemption.
  • UAS operations may not be conducted during night.
  • The UAS cannot be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.
  • The UAV may not operate in Class B, C, or D airspace without written approval from the FAA.
  • At least three days before flying, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flights Standards District Office (FSDO), to include:
    • A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials; and,
    • A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.
            The FAA has taken an important first step in allowing the use of UAVs for commercial purposes in the U.S. The permissions that have been granted are limited, as they only apply to the specific companies that made the requests. However, they are useful in identifying the steps the FAA currently consider to be critical for operating UAVs.  Until the FAA proposes definitive regulations, companies that make a Section 333 request to operate UAVs for commercial purposes in the U.S. should expect to be subject to similar constraints or identify alternatives that address the FAA’s safety and operational concerns. 

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Spatial Law and Policy Update (September 9, 2014)


Privacy







Data Quality


Government

    Cell-Phone Data Might Help Predict Ebola’s Spread  (MIT Technology Review)




Technology Platforms

GNSS



UAVs  





Internet of Things/Smart Grid/Intelligent Transportation Systems



Remote Sensing


Crowdsourcing


Miscellaneous


Wednesday, March 5, 2014

UAVs in the US: My Perspective

A number of people have been asking me  for my thoughts on the legal issues associated with the use of UAVs in the United States in light of a couple of recent articles. (See e.g , FAA Says Commercial Drone Operations are Illegal . . Public Says So What? and Busting the FAA's "Myth Busting Document".) Clearly, there are a number of what I would deem technical/safety issues associated with integrating UAVs into the existing legal and policy framework surrounding aircraft. These include issues such as licensing, spectrum, training, etc. I don't mean do downgrade the importance of these issues in order to facilitate the broad adoption of UAV use in the U.S., however my sense is that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is quite capable of coming up with regulations and policies that although not perfect, will be something that will satisfy many - if not most - stakeholders.  Moreover, it will almost certainly be a national standard that will provide for predictability and uniformity, which are important to most stakeholders (businesses and government agencies that wish for greater use of UAVs in the U.S.)


I believe the more troublesome issues are, and will be for some time, associated with UAVs that are used to collect information (of any kind).  First, because it is unclear whether the FAA has the authority or the internal capability to develop regulations around such issues as privacy, data ownership and data protection. Second, because the existing laws and policies on these issues in the U.S.are outdated, in a state of flux and/or often misunderstood. Third, because the issue is a  sensitive topic across the political spectrum; the left and the right are both concerned about who will collect the information and how it will be used. Finally, because there are so many other government authorities that have, or hope to have a say on these issues, including the Federal Trade Commission, state authorities and the courts (federal and state).


The result in the near term is likely to be a patchwork of inconsistent and in some cases conflicting laws and regulations as to what is required in order to begin collecting information, what information can be collected and how it can be used. The challenge for organizations that wish to collect such information will be to work through this legal and regulatory minefield in a manner that maximizes the benefits while minimizing the legal risks. Unfortunately for the FAA, it will sit in the middle of that likely mess and will continue to take much of the blame. 


I am not surprised to hear that there are those who question the FAA's ability (or willingness) to restrict some commercial use of UAVs. I imagine that the FAA is unlikely to challenge the use of very small UAV's, flown at low altitudes, over private property, for limited purposes, with the informed consent of the owner, even for "commercial purposes".  However, I do believe that in the near term the further one moves away from those set of conditions, the more likely you are to run up against some legal or regulatory authority.